• Users Online: 151
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-8

The effects of relationship enrichment counseling on marital satisfaction among infertile couples with a history of domestic violence


1 Faculty Member, Midwifery Department, Nursing and Midwifery School, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Center, Mazandaran University Of Medical Science, Sari, Iran
3 Masters Student in Midwifery Counselling, Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
4 PhD Student in Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Instructor of Midwifery, Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

Date of Submission19-Mar-2020
Date of Acceptance02-Sep-2020
Date of Web Publication10-Feb-2021

Correspondence Address:
Mrs. Fatemeh Alijani
Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JNMS.JNMS_21_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Context: One method for improving marital satisfaction is to educate relationship enrichment programs to couples.
Aim: This study aimed to determine the effects of relationship enrichment counseling on the marital satisfaction among infertile couples with a history of domestic violence.
Setting and Design: This study was conducted in Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari city in 2015.
Materials and Methods: This was a semiexperimental study with pre and postintervention measurements. The study was conducted in two intervention and control groups consisting of 44 infertile couples referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari city in 2015.
Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS 20 software was used for data analysis applying descriptive and inferential statistics (repeatedmeasures oneway ANOVA and twoway ANOVA).
Results: The means of marital satisfaction scores were obtained as 3.4 ± 0.36, 3.71 ± 0.4, and 3.87 ± 0.28 in intervention and 3.44 ± 0.47, 2.56 ± 0.3, and 2.52 ± 0.33 in control groups at pretest, immediate posttest, and 2 months after the intervention, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean score of quality of life between the two intervention and control groups at pre and postintervention (P = 0.75). As evidenced by the repeatedmeasures ANOVA test, the relationship enrichment program was effective in boosting marital satisfaction score among infertile couples (P = 0.001).
Conclusions: The enrichment program was effective in improving marital satisfaction and its all domains among infertile couples with a history of domestic violence.

Keywords: Domestic violence, Enrichment counseling, Infertile couples, Marital satisfaction


How to cite this article:
Poorheidari M, Ganji J, Hasani-Moghadam S, Azizi M, Alijani F. The effects of relationship enrichment counseling on marital satisfaction among infertile couples with a history of domestic violence. J Nurs Midwifery Sci 2021;8:1-8

How to cite this URL:
Poorheidari M, Ganji J, Hasani-Moghadam S, Azizi M, Alijani F. The effects of relationship enrichment counseling on marital satisfaction among infertile couples with a history of domestic violence. J Nurs Midwifery Sci [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 May 16];8:1-8. Available from: https://www.jnmsjournal.org/text.asp?2021/8/1/1/309042


  Introduction Top


Infertility is the inability of couples in conceiving a child despite regular copulations and avoiding contraceptives within 1 year.[1],[2] Infertility is a multidimensional crisis negatively affecting both couples and their families at different psychological, physical, and emotional levels.[3],[4] The frequency of infertility has been reported between 10% and 15% in different studies.[5],[6] Based on the report of the World Health Organization (WHO), around 80 million couples are affected with infertility worldwide.[7] Infertility has been reported in 10%–15% and 20% of couples in the United States and Western countries, respectively, and 2 million couples are added to these numbers annually.[8] Overall, infertility affects approximately one-fifth of couples around the world.[9] Psychological impacts of infertility are resulted from being childless, having aimless life, cut generation, and failing in conceiving a child.[10] This major psychological problem leads to low self-esteem; insecurity; low confidence; feeling of guilt; and psychological disorders such as depression, anxiety, mental conditions, fear of loneliness, marital conflicts, sexual failure, and finally domestic violence.[9],[11],[12]

Domestic violence is the most common form of violence against women and a major general health issue.[13] Violence is a behavioral pattern trying to force and control a close relative by using fearful, threatening, and agonizing gestures.[14] Individuals exposed to domestic violence are prone to psychological problems such as anxiety, depression, fear, nutritional problems, sexual disturbances, obsession, posttrauma stress disorders, and chronic physical and health problems.[15],[16] From other consequences of violence against women are low health status in them, breaks in family chain, and failure in performing wife role, which negatively affect marital satisfaction.[17]

Domestic violence against infertile women is relatively common. According to the WHO, 45% of all women face domestic violence.[18] In a study on Iranian infertile women, 61.8% of them had been exposed to domestic violence from their spouses.[18] In oversea studies, infertile women have also been in the verge of being violated by their husbands.[19],[20],[21],[22] The high prevalence of domestic violence among infertile couples leading to numerous marital problems necessitates implementing counseling services by specialists, and preventive measures to obviate these potential threats.

One of the methods for boosting marital satisfaction among couples is educating relationship enrichment strategies. These strategies aim to address the potential problems before reaching a critical level and to prepare and provide the couples with skills and perspectives required for coping with upcoming conundrums. The relationship enrichment is an approach stipulating on the acknowledgment of individuals' beliefs regarding the sources of problems. This approach assists the individuals to attain capabilities needed for problem solving. This program was initially introduced by Olson et al. in 1987. The program consisted of six main aims, each of them attending separate training activities. These purposes include boosting and expanding couples' capabilities; augmenting marital relationships; extending individual, marital, and familial goals; extending family financial budgeting; educating ten steps of resolving marital conflicts; and discovering major familial issues.[23] In their study in 2010, Etemadi O, et al. showed that relationship enrichment program boosted the quality of marital life among couples.[24] In a study in Iran which applied this model among interfile couples, both life quality and marital intimacy increased among the couples.[25]

Infertility is relatively of high prevalence in Iran. As well, the violence rate against infertile women is high; they are susceptible to social and psychological problems, hindering them from conceiving a child. On the other hand, no studies have yet explored the impacts of counseling-based interventions on improvement of marital problems among Iranian infertile couples. Therefore, we here aimed to assess the effects of relationship enrichment counseling on marital satisfaction among infertile couples experiencing domestic violence.


  Materials and Methods Top


The current study was a double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial performed with a pre- and post-intervention design and additional 2-month follow-up period. The study sample included infertile couples referred to the Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari city in the north of Iran during 2015.

The inclusion criteria were (1) Iranian nationality; (2) age of 20–45 years; (3) elapsing at least 6 months from marriage and at most 10 years of infertility diagnosis; (4) a history of domestic violence; (5) monogamy in men; (6) no recent disturbing experiences such as loss of loved ones, incurable diseases in family members, and relocating or losing job within the past 6 months; and (7) no psychological or physical diseases (such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression). The exclusion criteria included (1) becoming pregnant during the study, (2) missing more than two sessions by the couple or one of them, or being relocated, (3) not willing to continue the study, and (4) participating in similar counseling programs in other centers.

Based on accessible sampling, 104 couples were initially registered, from whom 36 and 34 couples were excluded due to not meeting the inclusion criteria and not willing to participate in the study, respectively. The qualified couples were enlisted. The couples were then randomly allocated to either intervention (22 couples) or control (22 couples) groups by block randomization (block size of 4). For blinding, central randomization was applied in which the randomized sequence of numbers was prepared by a person outside the research team based on codes assigned to the participants at registration step. The sample size in each group was calculated by the equation of sample size determination in interventional studies considering μ1–μ1 = 10.5, δ1 = 13.8, δ2 = 7.3, 95% confidence interval, and power of 80%. Based on these, the sample size was calculated as 38 couples per group, which finally was elevated to 44 regarding 10% attrition rate.[26]



At the end, four couples from each of intervention and control groups were omitted due to missing more than two sessions, and the final analysis was performed on 18 couples in each group [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Consort diagram

Click here to view


The data-gathering tools were demographic questionnaire scrutinizing demographic and clinical characteristics (infertility and marriage durations, history of addiction, etiology of female or male infertility, education level, occupation, income, and residency status), Standard Conflict Tactic Scale 2 (CTS2), and Enrich Marital Satisfaction Scale.

The standard Straus et al.'s Questionnaire of Domestic Violence (1979) has been modified in 1990 and 1996. The original version of this questionnaire included 39 questions reviewed by Kazhal et al. for being used in Iran.[27] Three questions related to sexual violence were omitted because of cultural conflicts, and the phrase “sexual partner” was replaced by “spouse.” The validity of this questionnaire has been verified previously.[28] This tool evaluates violence in physical (12 questions), sexual (4 questions), verbal (6 questions), psychological (8 questions), and physical assaults leading to injuries (6 questions) domains. Positive response to any question rendered the participant a victim of violence. This tool was utilized for assessing inclusion criteria in the couples.

The Enrich Marital Satisfaction Scale consists of 115 questions (extended version), which is used to evaluate potential problematic marital issues. As well, this tool aims to identify strength points contributing to reinforce the marital relationship. This scale was instructed by David H Olson, David J Fournier, and Joen M Drakman. The scale consists of 12 subscales including ideal deviation (question numbers 1–5), marital satisfaction (6–15), personality issues (16–25), relationship (26–35), resolving conflict (36–45), financial management (46–55), leisure activities (56–65), intercourse (66–75), children and their breeding (76–85), family and friends (86–95), equality seeking roles (96–105), and religious orientation (106–115). For scoring these statements, a Likert scale was used with items from very high to few. Higher scores represented better marital satisfaction.[29] The validity of this questionnaire has already been verified (Cronbach's α = 0.92).

Before initiation of the study, the couples referred to our infertility clinic were qualified for entering into the study by one of the researchers (MSc of midwifery). The questionnaires (demographic, CTS2, and Enrich Marital Satisfaction Scale) were then completed by each group. In the intervention group, relationship enrichment counseling was performed as group-based sessions (seven 90-min sessions weekly for 7 weeks) by a trained MSc. student of midwifery under the supervision of a Ph.D. student of clinical psychology. The sessions were held in the conference room of Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari city. The seven sessions of the relationship enrichment program were designed based on the book entitled “Education of Marital Life Enrichment” authored by Oulia et al.[23] [Table 1].
Table 1: The program of relationship enrichment counseling in infertile couples

Click here to view


On the other hand, the couples in the control group received no educations or counseling during the study and instead they were placed in the waiting list. Postintervention measurements were performed in both groups at the end of the intervention period and then after 2 months of follow-up. After the end of education programs and for meeting ethical guidelines, we thanked the couples in the control group and provided them with a CD containing the relationship enrichment educational contents.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed in SPSS 20 SPSS 20 (SPSS Inc., IBM Corporation, University in Chicago). Descriptive statistics including mean and through standard deviation were used for presenting the data. Inferential statistical tests including repeated-measures one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were applied. For comparisons of age and durations of marriage and infertility between the two groups, independent sample Student's t-test was used. For comparing couples' addiction, infertility etiologies in females and males, education levels, occupation, income, and residency between the two groups, Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were recruited.

Ethical considerations

After obtaining required permissions from authorized organizations, the study received the ethical code of IR.SHMU.REC.1394.22 from the Ethical Committee of the Research and Technology Deputy of Shahroud University of Medical Sciences. Furthermore, after noting the aims and methods of the study, informed written consents were acquired from the participants. The participants were ensured that their responses will be merely used toward the aims of the study and their information will be unnamed and confidential. They were also informed that they can leave the study at any time, and their decisions will not affect the health services presented to them as their rights.


  Results Top


The demographic information of infertile couples in both intervention and control groups is shown in [Table 2].
Table 2: Demographic features and their distribution between the intervention and control groups in infertile couples with a history of domestic violence referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari, 2015

Click here to view


The results of this study revealed that the intervention statistically significantly increased the means of marital satisfaction, ideal deviation, personal characteristics, relationship, conflict resolution, financial management, leisure activities, sexual relationship, family and friends, equality roles, and religious orientation, both immediately after the intervention and 2 months after the intervention (P = 0.001). On the other hand, the means of all the marital satisfaction parameters showed statistically significant declines both immediately and 2 months after the intervention in the control group (P = 0.001). Regarding the marital satisfaction parameters at preintervention, no statistically significant differences were observed in the means of ideal deviation (P = 0.44), marital satisfaction (P = 0.39), personal characteristics (P = 0.44), relationship (P = 0.64), conflict resolution (P = 0.77), financial management (P = 0.55), leisure activities (P = 0.44), sexual relationship (P = 0.70), family and friends (P = 0.67), equality roles (P = 0.48), and religious orientation (P = 0.75) domains between the two groups [Table 3].
Table 3: Comparisons of means and standard deviations of marital satisfaction aspects at pre-, post- and 2 months after relationship enrichment counseling program between the intervention and control groups in infertile couples with domestic violence referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari in 2015

Click here to view


It was concluded that the counseling program was effective in improving marital satisfaction scores of infertile couples with a history of domestic violence [repeated-measures ANOVA test retrieved statistically significant results, P = 0.001, [Table 4]].
Table 4: Comparing the effects of relationship enrichment counseling on marital satisfaction between two intervention and control groups of infertile couples with a history of domestic violence referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari in 2015

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


This study aimed to assess the effects of relationship enrichment counseling on marital satisfaction among infertile couples with a history of domestic violence referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari city. The results showed that the enrichment counseling can be an appropriate method for improving marital satisfaction. Overall, the intervention applied here improved all the domains of ideal deviation, marital satisfaction, personal characteristics, relationship, conflict resolution, financial management, leisure activities, sexual relationship, family and friends, equality roles, and religious orientation. The marital satisfaction, however, was not of statistically significant difference comparing the two groups before implementing relationship enrichment program. After 7 sessions of the counseling program during 7 weeks, marital satisfaction showed significant alternations immediately post intervention persisting at 2 months afterward in both groups. Conclusively, it seems that enrichment counseling program was effective in improving marital satisfaction among infertile couples with a history of domestic violence.

In their study regarding the effects of educational relationship enrichment program on the peace and satisfaction among infertile couples (2016), Miri et al. demonstrated that marital satisfaction elevated at both immediately and 2 months after the intervention.[30] In another study by Oulia et al. addressing the impacts of relationship enrichment program on marital satisfaction among couples, they found that the mean satisfaction score significantly increased both immediately and after 2 months of intervention in comparison with preintervention status.[31] Etemadi O, et al. (2010) in their study on the effects of group-based enrichment program on marital life satisfaction and intimacy, reported significant efficiency of the intervention in upgrading satisfaction score in the intervention group compared to the control group.[32] In the study of Etemadi O, et al. (2008) assessing the impacts of relationship enrichment program on marital satisfaction in Kuwait, the satisfaction level increased in the intervention group both immediately and after 2 months of the program initiation.[33] These findings were in concert with our observations indicating significantly elevated marital satisfaction postintervention in the test group. A major concern in Iranian culture is childbearing, which puts couples under pressure to conceive. On the other hand, infertile spouses perceive their marital life in jeopardy (i.e., separation and loneliness). These infertility-related factors eventually lead to unsatisfactory marital life, low self-esteem, limited sexual intercourses, and even domestic violence. Domestic violence is the most common violence form against women and one of the major general health concerns.[34] In explanation, it is notable that one of the ways for boosting marital satisfaction between couples is to provide them with relationship enrichment strategies which impart a substantial role in this field. This approach deals with the problems before being turned to crisis and equips couples with skills and intuitions required to encounter with upcoming problems. The relationship enrichment approach highlights the importance of acknowledging individuals' beliefs regarding the source of problems. Therefore, this approach helps the couples to acquire necessary skills to deal with their difficulties.

Markman et al. (1993) evaluated the long-term impacts of relationship enrichment program on improving communicative skills between couples and showed that couples assigned to the intervention group had higher and more stable sexual, physical, and communicational intimacies than control couples.[35] This was in line with our study as we also observed significantly elevated scores in communication and sexual relationship domains in the intervention group. An intimate relationship is the key to resolve marital conundrums. Satisfaction in both spouses is met when they are adequately intimate with each other and cooperate together to resolve their life problems.[36] Furthermore, sexual relationship is itself an essential tool for reaching intimacy. In fact, a satisfactory intercourse has been closely linked to an intimate connection between couples. Instead, unsatisfactory intercourse can as a source of marital conflicts.[37]

Etemati et al. studied the role of relationship therapy techniques on intimacy between couples. They reported that these techniques augmented emotional, logical, spiritual, social, and pleasure intimacies.[38] The findings of the recent study were in parallel to our observations regarding logical, spiritual, social, and pleasure intimacies. In fact, conflict resolution, religious orientation, family and friends, and leisure activities were among the domains which significantly increased following intervention. The ability to constructively resolve conflicts can assist couples to reach to an intimate and close relationship.[39] On the other hand, failure in resolving conflicts leads to incompatible relationships between couples, encompassing violating attitudes, insulting, reprimanding, criticizing, and physical harming. These events gradually terminate in hostility, hatred, and anger between couples[40] and ultimately lead to an unsatisfactory marriage. According to our findings, it seems that relationship enrichment counseling can effectively improve the marital satisfaction between infertile couples. Religious and beliefs can make the marital problems disappear. Furthermore, spending adequate leisure times together can strengthen marital satisfaction between couples.


  Conclusions Top


We demonstrated that the relationship enrichment counseling significantly affected marital satisfaction and its related domains among infertile couples with a history of domestic violence. It seems that social interaction of couples with each other, as well as with their friends and families, can improve their interaction abilities. The relationship and negotiation style in the families further highlights the role of social interactions in this matter. Intimate conversation and conflict resolution augment and enrich the martial relationship, leading to spouses' mental peace. Considering the improved marital satisfaction, the intervention applied here can be employed as an easy-to-learn, noninvasive, and helpful strategy. Performing marital counseling programs can promote marital satisfaction and therefore this framework can be employed by midwives in infertility clinics.

It is noteworthy that with time passing, long-term interventions can result in different outcomes. No controlled conditions and interindividual differences can affect the learning abilities of couples. It is recommended for researchers to assess the impacts of relationship enrichment counseling programs in longer durations and higher number of sessions and to consider individualized counseling meetings.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Authors' contributions

M. Poorheidari contributed with study conception, data collection, and drafting the manuscript. F. Alijani supervised the study design and helped with conducting this study. J. Ganji, S. Hasani Moghadam, and M. Azizi were the study advisors. All the authors critically evaluated the paper and provided the final draft.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was financially supported by Shahroud University of Medical Sciences. The study has been registered in the Iranian Clinical Trials Registry (code of IRCT2015052522409N1).

Acknowledgments

We thank the deputy of research and technology of Shahroud University of Medical Sciences. We also express our gratitude to the management team and staff of Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari, as well as all the couples assisted us on this project.



 
  References Top

1.
Jonathan S. Berek, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Berek & Novak's Gynecology, Golban Publisher, 2007.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mokhtari Sorkhani T. The Effectiveness of Infertility Counselling on the Quality of Life & Emotional Level of Infertile Couples Referred to Kermans Afzalipour Hospital, 20162017 (Doctoral dissertation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran); 2020.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Espada AÁ, Moreno-Rosset C. Psychological intervention in infertility: Guidelines for a clinical intervention protocol. Papeles del Psicòlogo 2008;29:186-96.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Sahraian K, Poursamar S, Jafarzadeh F. The relationship between social support and marital satisfaction in infertile women based on infertility factor. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Faculty 2015;12:1104-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Vahidi S, Ardalan A, Mohammad K. Prevalence of primary infertility in the Islamic Republic of Iran in 2004-2005. Asia Pac J Public Health 2009;21:287-93.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Samadaee-Gelehkolaee K, McCarthy BW, Khalilian A, Hamzehgardeshi Z, Peyvandi S, Elyasi F, et al. Factors associated with marital satisfaction in infertile couple: A comprehensive literature review. Glob J Health Sci 2015;8:96-109.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD. Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction: Report of a Meeting on Medical, Ethical and Social Domains of Assisted Reproduction, Held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Taylor, Hugh S; Pal, Lubna; Seli, Emre. Speroff's Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 9th Ed. Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW). 2019.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Zuraida A. Psychological Distress Among Infertile Women: Exploring Biopsychosocial Response to Infertility. Original Paper Salina AA; 2010. p. 19.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Sbaragli C, Morgante G, Goracci A, Hofkens T, De Leo V, Castrogiovanni P. Infertility and psychiatric morbidity. Fertil Steril 2008;90:2107-11.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Bushra P, Imtiaz Ahmad D, Sadia M, Sumaira K, Afsheen M, et al. Psychosocial adjustment of educated and uneducated infertile females of Pakistan. APMC 2008;2 (2).  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Péloquin K, Brassard A, Arpin V, Sabourin S, Wright J. Whose fault is it? Blame predicting psychological adjustment and couple satisfaction in couples seeking fertility treatment. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2018;39:64-72.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Garcia-Moreno C. Who Multi-Country on Women's Health and Domestic Violence Against Women; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bodaghabadi M. Prevalence of violence and related factors in pregnant women referring to Shahid Mobini Hospital. Hormozgan Med J 2007;11:71-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ergönen AT, Ozdemir MH, Can IO, Sönmez E, Salaçin S, Berberoglu E, et al. Domestic violence on pregnant women in Turkey. J Forensic Leg Med 2009;16:125-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Moazami SH, Criminology of domestic violence against partner in Sistan and Baluchestan province. J Res Amang Women. 2005(2): 39-53.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Zorrilla B, Pires M, Lasheras L, Morant C, Seoane L, Sanchez LM, et al. Intimate partner violence: Last year prevalence and association with socio-economic factors among women in Madrid, Spain. Eur J Public Health 2010;20:169-75.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kar M. A research about violence against women in Iran. J Res Amang Women 2001;14:23-87.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ardabily HE, Moghadam ZB, Salsali M, Ramezanzadeh F, Nedjat S. Prevalence and risk factors for domestic violence against infertile women in an Iranian setting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;112:15-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Ameh N, Kene TS, Onuh SO, Okohue JE, Umeora OU, Anozie OB. Burden of domestic violence amongst infertile women attending infertility clinics in Nigeria. Niger J Med 2007;16:375-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Yildizhan R, Adali E, Kolusari A, Kurdoglu M, Yildizhan B, Sahin G. Domestic violence against infertile women in a Turkish setting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;104:110-2.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Budh N, Chaturvedi S, Upadhyay M, Bhatia MS, Radhakrishnan G. Burden of domestic violence among infertile couples in Delhi: A hospital based study. J Pharm Practice Community Med 2017;3:274-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Oulia N. Marital Enrichment Training. 3rd: Danjeh Publisher; 2019.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Etemadi O, Isanejad O, Ahmadi SA, Etemadi O. Effectiveness of relationship enhancement on marital quality of couples. J Behav Sci 2010;4:16-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Keramat A, Masoomi SZ, Mousavi SA, Poorolajal J, Shobeiri F, Hazavhei SM. Quality of life and its related factors in infertile couples. J Res Health Sci 2013;14:57-64.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kazemian S, Esmaeily M, Ezzatollah F. Evaluation of the effectiveness of stress coping skills training based on therapeutic common factors on marital adjustment and conflict resolution styles in infertile women. Life Sci J 2012;9:3225-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Kazhal H. Evaluation of the domestic violence in pregnant women in Marivan. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci 2008;13:70-80.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Behboodi-Moghadam Z, Salsali M, Eftekhar-Ardabily H, Vaismoradi M, Ramezanzadeh F. Experiences of infertility through the lens of Iranian infertile women: A qualitative study. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2013;10:41-6.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Oraki M, Jamali C, Farajollahi M, Karimi FA. The effects of relationship enrichment program on compatibility of married students. Soc Cognition 2013;1:52-61.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Miri MR, Alizadeh M, Moasheri N, Ataee M, Moodi M. The effects of relationship enrichment program on compatibility and marital satisfaction of infertile couples. J Health Literacy Res 2016;1:13-24.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Etemadi O, Isanegad O, Ahmadi A. Effectiveness of relationship enhancement on marital quality of couples. J Behav Sci 2010;4:169.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Akbari F, Sahraee F, Sberi M H. Effectiveness of Marital Enrichment Group Teaching on Marital Satisfaction and Marital Intimacy; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Alqashan H. Enrichment training program and successful marriage in Kuwait: A field study on Kuwaiti couples. Digest Middle East Studies 2008;17:1-16.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
García-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C. WHO Multi-Country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence Against Women. Vol. 204. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. p. 1-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Markman HJ, Renick MJ, Floyd FJ, Stanley SM, Clements M. Preventing marital distress through communication and conflict management training: A 4- and 5-year follow-up. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993;61:70-7.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Esere MO, Oladun C. Obstacles and Suggested Solutions to Effective Communication in Marriage as Expressed by Married Adults in Kogi State, Nigeria. Procedia Soc Behav Sci.2014 (114); 584- 92.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Shahsiah M, Bahrami F, Mohebi S. On the relationship between sexual satisfaction and marital commitment among couples in Shahreza City, central part of Iran. Quarterly J Fundamentals Mental Health 2009;11:233-8.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Isanezhad O, Ahmadi SA, Etemadi O. Effectiveness of relationship enhancement on marital quality of couples. Int J Behav Sci 2010;4:9-16.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Somohano VC. Mindfulness, Attachment Style and Conflict Resolution Behaviors in Romantic Relationships: Humboldt State University; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Onsy E, Amer MM. Attitudes toward seeking couples counseling among Egyptian couples: Towards a deeper understanding of common marital conflicts and marital satisfaction. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2014;140:470-5.  Back to cited text no. 40
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed914    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded178    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]