• Users Online: 217
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 131-137

Relationship between psychological well-being and social capital and resilience among cancer patients


1 Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences and Health Service, Sari, Iran
2 Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
3 Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences and Health Service, Sari, Iran

Date of Submission03-Mar-2019
Date of Acceptance05-May-2019
Date of Web Publication11-Jul-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Hamideh Azimi Lolaty
Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Postal Code 4816715793, Sari
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JNMS.JNMS_11_19

Get Permissions

  Abstract 

Context: Research revealed resilience can decrease the effects of stress and improve quality of life among cancer patients. The role of positive factors such as psychological well-being and social capital is separately studied in cancer.
Aims: The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between the psychological well-being and social capital with resilience among cancer patients.
Setting and Design: This descriptive correlational study conducted on 163 cancer patients were selected patients referring to Touba Specialized Clinic in Sari from May to December 2018.
Materials and Methods: The data collection tools included Demographics Questionnaire, Riff's Psychological Well-being Scale (-2002), Onyx-Bullen's Social Capital Questionnaire (2000), and Connor-Davidson's Resilience Scale (2003).
Statistical Analysis Used: SPPS 20 and descriptive and inferential statistical methods (Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis and linear regression, Spearman correlation coefficient,) were employed. P < 0.05 was considered as the level of significance.
Results: The results revealed that the mean (standard deviation) of the psychological well-being, social capital, and resilience were 69.71 ± 5.49, 118.60 ± 8.51, and 78.48 ± 8.68, respectively. The study showed a positive and significant correlation between psychological well-being and resilience (r = 0.797; P = 0.001), and between social capital and resilience (r = 0.716, P = 0.001). The findings revealed that psychological well-being and social capital explained 70% of the resilience variation.
Conclusion: The results showed that psychological well-being and social capital have high relationship with cancer patients' resilience and it suggested through developing appropriate interventions on psychological well-being and social capital, it is possible to improve the cancer patients' resilience.

Keywords: Cancer, Resilience, Social capital, Well-being


How to cite this article:
Kordan Z, Azimi Lolaty H, Mousavinasab SN, Heydari Fard J. Relationship between psychological well-being and social capital and resilience among cancer patients. J Nurs Midwifery Sci 2019;6:131-7

How to cite this URL:
Kordan Z, Azimi Lolaty H, Mousavinasab SN, Heydari Fard J. Relationship between psychological well-being and social capital and resilience among cancer patients. J Nurs Midwifery Sci [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 23];6:131-7. Available from: http://www.jnmsjournal.org/text.asp?2019/6/3/131/262555


  Introduction Top


Diagnosing cancer is an unpleasant experience for any person more than any other illness due to its challenging nature and its uncertain consequences, from the onset of diagnosis and during the therapeutic follow-ups.[1] It was estimated by the year 2030, the incidence of cancer patients will rise to 21.6 million.[2] Earlier cancer diagnoses and therapies also led to an increase in survival of the cancer. The psychosocial impacts of the cancer on patients and their families include emotional problems, supportive care needs, and quality of life of cancer patients and their families.[3] Cancerous patients have different degrees of psychological problems and disorders; the range of which can vary from stress, depression, anxiety, decreased life quality and fearing disease relapse and death.[4]

There are several relevant studies conducted, which emphasize the role of the psychological and social factors separately about resilience in cancer. Resilience viewed as ability for dealing with stress, successfully. It is an important aim of treatment in anxiety, depression, and stress reactions.[5] Psychological well-being includes individual growth, self-acceptance, the sense of autonomy, the goal of life, positive relationships with others, and environmental domination (the potential to effectively manage personal life and the surrounding world).[6] Well-being also refers to a sort of feeling healthy resulting from being fully aware of the integrity of individual aspects and consists of spiritual elements of life.[7] Some studies were done on psychological well-being among cancer patients. A study showed the cancer patients in compared with individuals who have chronic condition or without a previous cancer diagnosis and serious chronic condition experienced poorer health and well-being following cancer and cancer treatment.[8] Another study also revealed the breast cancer survivors in Jordan in compared with patients from Western countries have good quality of life scores. On the other hand, their psychological well-being is more impaired.[9],[10] Social capital is a construct that concerning social relations at both individual and societal levels. It consists of social networks, norms of reciprocity, or social support and social trust.[11] An exploratory study of social capital among cancer survivorship revealed the importance of including social capital as an integral part of the approach to the cancer patient experiences.[12] On the other hand, a systematic review study among the studies on the association between all cause of mortality and social capital, cancer and cardiovascular disease revealed there was not an adequate association between social capital and health outcomes.[13] In addition, a retrospective comparative study in Iran pursuing the goal to determine health inequalities and social capital of the cancer-suffering patients and cancer-free individuals concluded that health inequalities and cancer result from the concurrent interaction between behavioral–psychological and biological factors with various components of social capital.[14] Furthermore, a descriptive and explanatory study revealed that the correlation level between social support and resilience is 0.66, and social support can predict 44% of resilience variance in cancer patients.[15] Studies are increasing on the role of positive mental health constructs such as resilience, psychological well-being, and social capital for adjustment to life after cancer successfully.[12],[13],[16]

As mentioned above, the results of studies has suggested explore of the relationship between both the psychological and social factors with resilience. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on the resilience and psychological well-being and social capital among cancer patients in Iran. Therefore, we conducted a study on cancer patients to assess their resilience, psychological well-being and social capital and relationship between resilience with them. Other objectives of the study were to determine association between resilience with psychological well-being, as an individual, and social capital, as a social factor among the patients referring to Touba Specialized Clinic.


  Materials and Methods Top


Design

This is a descriptive-correlational study.

Participations and setting

The statistical population of this study was cancer patients (gastro-intestine, breast cancer, lymphoma and skin cancer) referred to a research and educational cancer Clinic named Touba specialized clinic, in Sari Mazandaran province in Iran. Samples were selected by convenient sampling method from 2018 May to December 2018. The study inclusion criteria included: (1) Suffering from cancer (common cancer in Mazandaran province: gastrointestinal cancer, skin, breast and lymphoma), (2) Definitive diagnosis of cancer based on the specialized tests and the oncologist's comments, (3) Having medical record in Touba Specialized Clinic affiliated cancer department, (4) Not participating in another study during the present study implementation, (5) the age group 18. (6) No suffering from any sort of psychological disorder concurrently with cancer, (7) no participating in another research, (8) not being in the end stage of cancer.

After that, with ethical considerations, the samples filled the research questionnaires.

The study sample size was calculated using regression analysis with 12 variables, overall, 150 individuals were estimated. Moreover, by considering loss as 10%, it increased to 163 individuals.

Data collection

Data collection tools included Demographics Questionnaire [Table 1] and Riff's Psychological Well-being Scale, Onyx-Bullen's Social Capital Questionnaire, and Connor-Davidson's Resilience Scale. (a) Demographics questionnaire (the patient and the caregivers): the patient's and caregivers' demographics showed in [Table 1].
Table 1: Medical-demographic characteristics of cancer-suffering patients referring to tuba specialized clinic in Sari in 2018

Click here to view


Riff's Psychological Well-being Scale (short form)

It has 6 dimensions including the purpose in life, self-acceptance, autonomy, personal growth, positive relations with others, and environmental mastery. Each of these dimensions consists of 3 items. The answers to the items in this part were developed and scored in 6-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree) for positive items and vice versa, and overall, the score range of 18 items has been the minimum = 18 and maximum = 180 score. The negative items of the questionnaire (items 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 13, and 17) have been inversely scored. The score range 18–42 low, 43–63 average, and 64 and higher score as higher psychological well-being. The reliability and validity of this scale have been assessed in the some studies.[17],[18] In Iran, construct validity of this questionnaire has been tested by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Furthermore, reliability tested by test–re-test and by Alpha-Cronbach and approved in Iran. The internal consistencies ranged from 0.51 to 0.76 for six subscales and for total was 0.71.[19] In the present study, internal consistency of the scale has been estimated as 0.83 by Alpha-Cronbach.

Onyx-Bullen's social capital questionnaire

It has two main dimensions as cognitive and structural and also 8 subfactors of the social capital. The social capital's cognitive dimensions encompass 19 items including participating in formal community (7 items), neighborhood connections (6 items), connections with family and friends (3 items), and work connections (3 items). In addition, the structural and relational dimensions of the social capital cover 17 items including proactivity (8 items), trust and politics (5 items), tolerance of diversity (2 items), and the value of life (2 items). The answers to the items in this part were developed and scored in 5-point Likert scale from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high), and overall, the score range of 36 items has been the minimum = 36 and maximum = 180. The score range 36–64 indicated very low, 65–96 low, 97–122 average, 123–151 high, and 152–180 as very high social capital. The reliability and validity of this questionnaire have been verified in the domestic and foreign studies.[20],[21] In Iran, the psychometric properties (construct, concurrent and face validities, internal consistency, test–retest reliability) of the Persian Version of Onyx Social Capital Scale were done, and the results showed an acceptable validity and reliability.[22],[23] The internal consistency of this questionnaire in this study has been calculated as 0.74 by Alpha-Cronbach.

The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale

This questionnaire has been efficiently able to separate the resilient individuals from the nonresilient ones and can be used in research and clinical situations. The answers to the items in this part were developed and scored in 4-point Likert scale from 0 (absolutely incorrect) to 4 (always correct), and overall, the score range of 25 items has been the minimum = 0 and maximum = 100 score. The cut-off point for this questionnaire is 50, which means the score above 50 indicates resilient ones, and the higher this score than 50, the individual will be in the higher resilience level and vice versa. The factor analysis-derived results suggest that this test has 5 factors: 1 – personal competence, high standards, and tenacity; 2 – trust in one's instincts, tolerance of negative affect, and the strengthening effects of stress; 3 – positive acceptance of change and secure relationships; 4 – control; and 5 – spiritual influences. Connor-Davidson reported the Alpha-Cronbach of the resilience scale as 0.89 and also reliability coefficient yielded by test–retest in a 4-week interval as 0.87.[5] Furthermore, the psychometrics of the scale has been approved in the other study.[24] In Iranian population, the scale's psychometric properties have been tested and approved.[25] The internal consistency of the resilience scale in the present research has been estimated as 0.86 by Alpha-Cronbach.

Data analysis

The SPSS 20 software has been employed to analyze. The descriptive statistics indicators including the mean and standard deviation have been used to describe the research samples and the inferential statistical tests, including spearman correlation coefficient, Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, and linear regression, have been applied. P<0.05 was considered as the level of significance.

Ethical considerations

This research study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, by the code of ethics No: IR.MAZUMS.REC.1397.1596 in 2018. The written information about the purpose and the nature of the study was given to the participants. Moreover, the research individuals were assured that their responses would be used for the research purposes, and all their information would remain confidential by preserving the etiquette of anonymity.


  Results Top


Summary of the samples, medical–demographic characteristics is shown in [Table 1].

The study showed a significant positive relationship between psychological well-being and social capital with resilience (r = 0.78; P = 0.001) (r = 0.75; P = 0.001), respectively.

The study showed a significant negative relationship between age with resilience (r = −0.209; P = 0.008).

[Table 2] showed statistical difference between the mean of scores the resilience with some medical–demographic variables.
Table 2: Mean and standard deviation of resilience of cancer patients according to the medical-demographics variables

Click here to view


The study revealed no significant statistical difference between the mean of scores the psychological well-being, social capital, and resilience with other medical–demographic variables.

Multiple regression analysis showed that psychological well-being and social capital could explain approximately 70% of the resilience variation [Table 3].
Table 3: Multiple linear regression analysis of treatment type, disease duration, surgery history, psychological well-being, and social capital associated for resilience scores

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The current research analyzes the relationship between the psychological well-being and social capital with resilience in the cancer patients referring to Touba Specialized Clinic in Sari, 2018. The results implied that both variables, i.e., the psychological well-being and social capital have a significant and positive relationship with resilience.-. Thus, in the continuation, some studies somewhat pursuing the present study goals are mentioned. A review study showed there is not strong evidence of social capital affecting cancer patients.[13] Other study showed associations between resilience and levels of social capital among HIV patients.[26]

A study results showed there was a relation between subjective well-being with the Perception of Future dimension of the resilience that measured by the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA). Individuals who view their future in a positive and optimistic way have better subjective well-being than individuals who perceive their future to be less positive and promising.[26] The study drawn results are compatible with those of the present research. In fact, resilient individuals with optimistic and positive view are less disappointed and are more tolerant of the problems. The individuals with powerful sense of coherence have the potential for perceiving, predicting, and organizing the internal and external stresses and apply the available resources coping with stress.[27] Another study also revealed that resilience contributes to low emotional stress in cancer patients.[28] The study showed high and positive relationship between psychological well-being and social capital with the cancer patients, resilience. Furthermore, those variables could predict 70% of resilience variation in cancer-stricken patients [Table 3].

In congruent with our results, a study concluded a significant positive relationship between social support and resilience among Chinese patients with cancer bladder.[29] Regression test results in another study showed the social support could predict only 44% of the resilience variance among the cancer sufferers.[15]

Furthermore, the present study showed weak and negatively significant relationship between the resilience with age. This way, as age increases, resilience decreases and vice versa; an exploratory cross-sectional study on association of resilience and age in individuals with colorectal cancer revealed older patients reported higher resilience and lower emotional distress.[30] The study is inconsistent with our study. Our results can attribute to this as the age rises, responsibility increases, and psychological, social, economic, and personal burden of disease increase, consequently psychological well-being, social capital, and resilience decreases.

Furthermore, the present study showed statistically significant relationship between the resilience with the educational level of the patients. Education plays a remarkable role in employing coping strategies; this way that the individuals with higher education meaningfully use effective coping strategies more, while those with lower education significantly employed more maladaptive strategies.[31] This study revealed that there was a significant difference between resilience with the types of cancer. The patients with breast cancer and skin cancer had higher and less resilience in the study, in comparison with the rest of the cancers, respectively [Table 2]. Although many studies revealed there are different levels of emotional distress according to type of cancers, few studies were down on relationship between resilience and type of cancer among cancer patients. A study showed that there was a significant relationship between caregivers, resilience and types of cancer of their patients.[32]

The study had two limitations. This study was done by a cross-sectional method with a convenient sampling; thus, generalization and causality cannot be implied from the results. On the other side, the study had some strengthens such as a board range of age, variety in type of cancers, samples included from a large and central cancer center in Mazandaran Province, and an adequate sample size of cancer patients.


  Conclusion Top


The present study indicated that psychological well-being and social capital play a remarkable role in cancer stricken patients' resilience, and the therapists and researchers can consider the role of the psychological interventions and strengthening social capital in boosting the patients' resilience.

Further studies are needed to increase the understanding of the ways to improving resilience. Well-designed intervention studies suggested for strengthening resilience in cancer patients with emphasize on the effects of improving psychological well-being and social capital on resilience.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Authors' contribution

Z. Kordan contributed with data collection, writing the first draft of the article. H Azimi Lolaty designed and supervised the work. S. N Mousavinasab contributed data analysis and interpretation results. J. Haydari Fard was advisors of the article.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study financially was supported by Research deputy of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Deputy of Research Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences for their financial support of this project (No: 1596). The authors of this article feel honored to express their gratitude to the efforts of the management of Tuba Specialized Clinic in Sari, all of the clinic staff and all respectable patients who helped with this research.

 
  References Top

1.
Razmi L, Behzadipur S, Tahmasebi S. The effectiveness of group hope therapy on increasing the resiliency and hope of life in women with breast cancer. Iran J Surg 2016;24:60-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. Cancer Fact Sheet. February, 2017. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2017.html. [Last accessed on 2018 Dec 29].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Grassi L, Spiegel D, Riba M. Advancing psychosocial care in cancer patients. F1000Res 2017;6:2083.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hyphantis T, Papadimitriou I, Petrakis D, Fountzilas G, Repana D, Assimakopoulos K, et al. Psychiatric manifestations, personality traits and health-related quality of life in cancer of unknown primary site. Psychooncology 2013;22:2009-15.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003;18:76-82.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989;57:1069-81.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Dumalaon-Canaria JA, Prichard I, Hutchinson AD, Wilson C. Fear of cancer recurrence and psychological well-being in women with breast cancer: The role of causal cancer attributions and optimism. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018;27:1-12.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Elliott J, Fallows A, Staetsky L, Smith PW, Foster CL, Maher EJ, et al. The health and well-being of cancer survivors in the UK: Findings from a population-based survey. Br J Cancer 2011;105 Suppl 1:S11-20.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Novoa Gómez MM, Vargas Gutiérrez RM, Obispo Castellanos SA, Pertuz Vergara M, Rivera Pradilla YK. Psychological well-being and quality of life in patients treated for thyroid cancer after surgery. Ter Psicol 2010;28:69-84.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Abu-Helalah M, Al-Hanaqta M, Alshraideh H, Abdulbaqi N, Hijazeen J. Quality of life and psychological well-being of breast cancer survivors in Jordan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:5927-36.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ferlander S. The importance of different forms of social capital for health. Acta Sociol 2007;50:115-28.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Joubert LB, Wan AH, Bhatt S, Chan CL. An exploratory study of social capital and cancer survivorship: Meaning and interpersonal relationships among Chinese with cancer. Illness Crisis Loss 2015;23:33-44.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Choi M, Mesa-Frias M, Nuesch E, Hargreaves J, Prieto-Merino D, Bowling A, et al. Social capital, mortality, cardiovascular events and cancer: A systematic review of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43:1895-920.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Tavakol M, Naseri Rad M. Health and social capital inequalities among people affected/not affected by cancer, referring to cancer institute of Tehran. J Payavard Salamat 2012;6:10-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Rajeyan MG. Relationship between social support and resilience among patients with cancer. J Soc Work Res 2015;1:37-74.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Holtmaat K, van der Spek N, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Positive mental health among cancer survivors: Overlap in psychological well-being, personal meaning, and posttraumatic growth. Support Care Cancer 2019;27:443-50.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Van Dierendonck D. The construct validity of Ryff's scales of psychological well-being and its extension with spiritual well-being. Pers Individ Dif 2004;36:629-43.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gao J, McLellan R. Using Ryff's scales of psychological well-being in adolescents in mainland China. BMC Psychol 2018;6:17.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Khanjani M, Shahidi S, Fath-Abadi J, Mazaheri MA, Shokri O. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Ryff's scale of psychological well-being, short form (18-item) among male and female students. J Thought Behav Clin Psychol 2014;8:27-36.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Onyx J, Bullen P. Measuring social capital in five communities. J Appl Behav Sci 2000;36:23-42.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Abdulahad R, Brownlee K, Graham JR, Montelpare WJ. Measuring social capital: An adaptation and translation into Arabic of the Onyx and Bullen social capital scale for Iraqi-Canadians. Aust Soc Work 2018;71:462-77.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Eftekharin R, Kaldi AR, Sam S, Sahaf R, Fadaei Vatan R. Validity and reliability of Persian version of onyx social capital scale in elderly people. Iran J Ageing 2016;11:174-89.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Yari A, Nadrian H, Rashidian H, Nedjat S, Esmaeilnasab N, Doroudi R, et al. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of social capital questionnaire in Iran. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2014;28:17.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Gucciardi DF, Jackson B, Coulter TJ, Mallett CJ. The connor-davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC): Dimensionality and age-related measurement invariance with Australian cricketers. Psychol Sport Exerc 2011;12:423-33.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Mohammadi M. Factors Affecting the Resilience of People at Risk of Substance Abuse (Doctoral dissertation, MA Thesis. Tabriz: Tabriz University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Arnesen A. Resilience, social capital, and well-being: A cross-sectional study in a context of adversity [Master thesis]. Masteroppgave: University of Oslo; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Li Z, Liu T, Han J, Li T, Zhu Q, Wang A. Confrontation as a mediator between sense of coherence and self-management behaviors among elderly patients with coronary heart disease in North China. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2017;11:201-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Min JA, Yoon S, Lee CU, Chae JH, Lee C, Song KY, et al. Psychological resilience contributes to low emotional distress in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2013;21:2469-76.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Li MY, Yang YL, Liu L, Wang L. Effects of social support, hope and resilience on quality of life among Chinese bladder cancer patients: A cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016;14:73.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Cohen M, Baziliansky S, Beny A. The association of resilience and age in individuals with colorectal cancer: An exploratory cross-sectional study. J Geriatr Oncol 2014;5:33-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Amirpour B. Comparison of resiliency and depression in cardiac patients and normal people. Razi J Med Sci 2014;21:73-82.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Fekrat Salim N, Borhani F, Boozari Pour M, Khabazkhoob M. Correlation between perceived social support and resilience in the family of patients with cancer. J Res Med Dent Sci 2019;7:158-62.  Back to cited text no. 32
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed52    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]