• Users Online: 29
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 68-73

Spousal relationship and childbearing: A review article


1 Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Date of Submission19-Aug-2018
Date of Acceptance26-Sep-2018
Date of Web Publication29-Nov-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Nahid Maleki-Saghooni
Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JNMS.JNMS_25_18

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


Context: In the recent years, unprecedented reduction in fertility occurred in many countries that affected by demographic, economic, social, political, cultural, and familial factors.
Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate studies those determine the correlation between spousal relationship and childbearing.
Setting and Design: In this review study, to find both published Persian and English articles, database of Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Scientific Information Database, and Magiran were searched using keywords of Spousal OR Marital OR Couple AND Relationship AND Childbearing OR Sex Behavior OR Reproductive Behavior that were selected from the MeSH Glossary. There was no limitation about place and study design.
Materials and Methods: Two researchers conducted the electronic search on mentioned databases. The reliability of the data collection method was examined by a third researcher who had good knowledge of the subject but was not aware of the name of journal and the authors.
Statistical Analysis Used: No.
Results: Of the 30 studies reviewed, 20 papers directly (increase interaction between spouses increased willingness to childbearing), 9 articles inversely (increase interaction between spouses increased use of contraception and reduced fertility), and one study mutually were shown relationship between spousal relationship and childbearing.
Conclusion: It can be said that marital interactions and spousal relationships have a significant correlation with childbearing, and most of the studies mention that there is a direct relationship between them. Fertility growth is impossible without the promotion of individual, social, and familial factors, such as couples' emotional relationships, and policymakers should pay attention to this and plan accordingly.

Keywords: Childbearing, Couple relationship, Marital relationship, Reproductive behavior, Sex behavior, Spousal relationship


How to cite this article:
Askari F, Khadivzadeh T, Maleki-Saghooni N. Spousal relationship and childbearing: A review article. J Nurs Midwifery Sci 2018;5:68-73

How to cite this URL:
Askari F, Khadivzadeh T, Maleki-Saghooni N. Spousal relationship and childbearing: A review article. J Nurs Midwifery Sci [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 13];5:68-73. Available from: http://www.jnmsjournal.org/text.asp?2018/5/2/68/246372




  Introduction Top


In recent years, significant demographic changes have taken place in the world. It is expressed that one of the most important changes is the unprecedented reduction in fertility rate in all regions of the world.[1] In Iran, family characteristics in term of size have also changed dramatically.[2] The fastest fertility decline occurred between 1985 and 2006, and total fertility rates ranged from 6 to 1.9.[3] Some studies have identified five stages of fertility transition in Iran:

  • Stage 1: A decline in fertility rates since the early 1970s after a long period of high fertility in the country
  • Stage 2: A rise in fertility rates during the years 1976–1980
  • Stage 3: A relatively constant population growth between 1980 and 1984
  • Stage 4: A slow decline in fertility rates between 1985 and 1988
  • Stage 5: A significant decline in fertility rates since 1989.[3]


Childbearing, one of the most important decisions and events in life and the subject of much debate in the field of demography, contributes to positive emotional and economic values and strengthen security and relationship continuity,[4],[5],[6] and it should be culturally and socially conceptualized.[7] Women's motivation for childbearing and their attitudes to the average number of children varies from one ethnic group to another.[8] Human behaviors, including fertility behaviors, are associated with the social and cultural environment,[9] and cultural differences between individuals and societies lead to different reproductive behaviors.[10] In general, reproduction, in addition to biomedical aspects, has a social and cultural form that varies in relation to different factors in different societies. The opportunities and incentives which promote women's fertility are also different in populations and subgroups and vary from one community to another.[8] Decision-making on fertility is one of the major events in the life of couples, which in turn affects many aspects of life such as health, the economic situation, and the household welfare.[11] Large changes in fertility have attracted attention of many scholars and policymakers to the problem of fertility, and fertility rates are shown to have significant effects on the development of social and natural resources.[11] Due to a significant decline in population growth, a comprehensive crisis management policy should be employed in many countries. To achieve this goal, first, the factors affecting fertility and parenting need to be precisely defined.[12] Low fertility in developed countries is related to the low levels of gender equality. It is due to the lack of women's support and poor employment. To increase the fertility rates, it is necessary to afford gender equality.[13] A careful perusal of literature shows that variety of factors (i.e., age, religion, education, mother's occupation, number of children, first gestational age, access to contraceptive methods, healthy lifestyle, family income, patterns of familiarity, and marriage (traditional, modern, and postmodern), ethnicity, familial marriage, women's independence, place of birth (city and village), degree of industrialization, social development, cultural beliefs and traditions, community attention to the number of family members, media, the interest of individuals in the family and their tendency toward the formation of families, and the interaction between the couples play a key role in fertility and childbearing.[9],[14],[15],[16] The experience of fertility transition in Iran shows that although family planning programs are effective in reducing the fertility rates, changes in the fertility behaviors are affected by other factors.[17] It is very important to pay attention to health, population growth and development, the achievement of the desired number, and the right time for childbearing because they can be beneficial for women, families, and communities.[18],[19] Iran's new demographic policy for increasing population suggests that policymakers should pay more attention to important fertility factors.[12] As mentioned earlier, one of the factors affecting fertility is couples' relationships as well as its changes. In a study conducted by Sadegh Moghadam et al. on Iranian couple, it was found that the highest degree of marital satisfaction was associated with parenting, sexual issues, friends and relatives' network, communication, and financial issues. However, the lowest degree of marital satisfaction was related to personality factors and religious issues.[20] The results of a qualitative study by Rashid showed that women who had a romantic relationship with their husbands were more interested in having more children to strengthen the duration and rigorousness of this relationship.[21] In another study, the instability of families and inappropriate relationships between couples caused a decrease in fertility rates.[22] In contrast, a number of studies have shown that the positive emotional relationships between spouses increase their tendency to use modern family planning methods (including surgical, hormonal, and barrier contraception methods), thereby reducing fertility.[23],[24] The different results from various studies on this issue and the importance of various individual and social factors contributing to fertility have been the impetus for the current research. This study is an attempt to examine whether the relationships between the couples is associated with fertility and childbearing behavior. We hope that the results of the study contribute to the goal of population policies in Iran.


  Materials and Methods Top


In this review study, to find published Persian and English articles related to the topic, in international databases including Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, SID, Irandoc, IranMedex, and Magiran were searched using keywords including Spousal OR marital OR Couple AND Relationship AND Childbearing OR Sex Behavior OR Reproductive Behavior which were selected from the MeSH Glossary until December 2017. There was no limitation about place, time, and study design.

Selection of related studies was carried out in three phases as follows: in the first step, two researchers conducted the electronic search on mentioned databases using mention keywords in the title and abstract of the articles, and duplicated records were removed. In the second step, manual search of resource and article citations was used to find articles that did not obtain by electronic search. In the final step, the full text of articles was searched (Ethical ID number: IR.MUMS.NURSE.REC.1397.019), and articles with inclusion criteria were selected to participate in the study; we did not find any gray literature related to search topic.

Data extraction was undertaken by two independent reviewers. We extracted the following data according to a predefined checklist including authors, publication year, place, type of the study, sample size, spousal relationship, and childbearing.

Data were independently assessed by two reviewers, and disparities were resolved by discussion with a third researcher.


  Results Top


In the preliminary search, 139 relevant articles to the subject of the study were identified. After reviewing the title and abstract of articles, 91 articles were deleted and 50 articles were left. Subsequently, the articles were examined, and studies which met the review criteria (29 articles) were selected. After reviewing the references and citations of the articles, one study met the criteria. Finally, 30 articles were included in the study, of which 11 were qualitative, and other studies were quantitative [Figure 1].
Figure 1: PRISMA flowchart of the study selection process

Click here to view


The data presented in these studies were extracted and recorded in [Table 1].
Table 1: The information of the reviewed papers

Click here to view


In this table, direct means (increase interaction between spouses increased willingness to childbearing), indirect means (increase interaction between spouses increased use of contraception and reduced fertility), and mutual means both of them.

Of the 30 studies reviewed, 20 papers directly (increase interaction between spouses increased willingness to childbearing), 9 articles inversely (increase interaction between spouses increased use of contraception and reduced fertility), and one study mutually were shown relationship between spousal relationship and childbearing.


  Discussion Top


For decades, there is much debate in marital life and the question is whether spousal relationships are relevant with childbearing or not?[25] In response, it was said that fertility is not merely a physical phenomenon, and individual mentalities and thoughts play an important role.[17] In this regard, various studies have reported different results. In another study, the father's support of the spouse and the cooperation with her in taking care of children and accepting parental responsibilities reduced the burden of taking care of children in the mother, and this maternal support system has increased marital stability, improved marital satisfaction, making investment on children, and lead to decision-making for giving birth to later child.[26] In the study by Frank et al., gender differences or the difference in the relative positions of men and women in society due to the lack of support for women led to a reduction in the decision for giving birth.[27] Furthermore, the results of studies in Pakistan (2001) and India (2004) showed the various aspects of women's decision-making autonomy, such as women's liberation, their participation in family decision-making and engagement with the partner, strongly affect the fertility preferences and decision-making process.[28],[29] Furthermore, the role of father's participation, having stable relationships with wife and woman's satisfaction from this relationship, in future fertility decision-making is also derived from the results of other studies.[30],[31],[32],[33] Another study expressed that when spousal relationships were disrupted, in which leads to breaking the relationship and separation, existence of children can be a reason for subsist or return to this unstable spousal relationship.[34] However, based on the available research and evidence in this context, it should be noted that childbearing in this condition not only does not improve the quality of relationship but may also have negative effects on couples' life. Many mothers after childbirth are griping of social isolation, decreased social intercourse, and lack of time to rest, and in this situation, the role of father support and care from his child or wife is clearly understood.[35] Results of a study point to the role of domestic violence against women and the increased use of contraceptive methods in a hidden manner and reduce childbearing.[36] The results of a qualitative study showed that when there is no cooperation between husband and wife and women are under the control of their husbands, more likely using contraceptive methods.[37],[38],[39] The results of a review study revealed, in young parents whose relationships are not in sufficient stability, early fatherhood similar to early motherhood, are especial critical periods.[40] A population-based study showed that the factors associated with society, such as spousal relationships, play an important role in childbearing tendency, particularly in developing countries with low socioeconomic status, unintended pregnancy rate remains high.[41] The results of a study conducted in Iran showed that many factors, such as individual factors (age of marriage and quality of life), family factors (marital satisfaction), and social factors (social support), can influence the decision of men to have a child.

Policymakers must come up with the necessary strategies to promote the social, economic, and familial condition of couples in order to encourage them to have more children at the right time.[42] One study performed in Israel showed that reason of high fertility rate in this country is a set of factors associated with the social, economic, cultural, and political environment including government support from family to childbearing, social support of practitioner women, pay attention to family, spousal relationship, and partly equal gender role attitude of men and women.[43] In another study, synergistic effect of individual, marital, organizational, and social factors on implementation of childbearing programs has been shown.[44] All mentioned studies indicate a direct relationship between marital relationship and childbearing in spouses. In our review, we found a number of articles that showed a reverse relationship between these two variables, for instance in 9 studies enhanced interaction between spouses lead to childbearing reduction and decreased interaction between them increased the number of children. In these studies, more interaction between spouses has a direct relation with family planning methods.[16],[23],[24],[45],[46],[47],[48],[49],[50] Furthermore, one study that was conducted in Bolivia showed that domestic violence against women associated with less using of contraceptive methods and increased unwanted pregnancy.[51] In our search, an article was found that, based on fertility theory, both positive and negative dimensions of the emotional bond between husband and wife were described as potential factors for fertility and childbearing constraint. Accordingly, various aspects of marital relationships can lead to fertility or contraception constraint.[52],[53] Without any doubt, childbearing and getting father or mother are one of the most respected human experiences and also are according to innate human tendency to sustain their generation and survival so to achieve this goal; it is necessary to pay attention to various factors affecting childbearing, including marital relationship. The main strength of this study was to summarize various studies on couples' marital relationships and their association with childbearing and knowledge of demographic researchers and policymakers of this correlation, which can provide the basis for planning and policymaking according to various individual, social, and family factors including propose necessary strategies to strengthen marital relationships and interactions. Failure to access unpublished reports, different methods of conducting studies, and different and diverse sample size, which makes it difficult to compare and analyze the results, were the limitations to our study.


  Conclusion Top


It can be said that marital interactions and spousal relationships have a significant correlation with childbearing, and most of the studies mention that there is a direct relationship between them.

For a number of spouses, the relationship between these two variables is low or too conventional, and in other number of spouses, this relationship becomes dominant over the time. Some of these changes are made after childbirth, which is related to individual, marital, social, or birth attributes. Changes in economic, social, and familial and also changes in people's values and beliefs on fertility are effective on their childbearing and fertility behaviors, so fertility growth is impossible without the promotion of the conditions and factors that cause it, including individual, social, and familial factors, such as couples' emotional relationships, and policymakers should pay attention to this and plan accordingly.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Author contribution

All authors contributed to this research.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported financially by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, according to ID number IR.MUMS. NURSE.REC.1397.019 dated 1397.3.8.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank and appreciate the support of the central library of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences for accessing to information and scientific resources.



 
  References Top

1.
Baird V. The No-Nonsense Guide to World Population. New Internationalist; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P. Fertility decline in the Islamic Republic of Iran: 1972–2000. Asian Popul Stud 2006;2:217-37.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P. National and Provincial-level Fertility Trends in Iran; 1972-2000. Available from: https://www.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/156615121.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Khadivzadeh T, Shakeri MT. Relationship between fertility motivations and preferences in couples. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2014;7:8-18.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Khadivzadeh T, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Bahrami M, Taghipour A, Abbasi Shavazi J. The influence of social network on couples' intention to have the first child. Iran J Reprod Med 2013;11:209-18.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Khadivzadeh T, Arghavani E, Shakeri MT. Relationship between fertility motivations and preferences in couples. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2014;17:8-18.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Khadivzadeh T, Arghavani E, Shakeri MT. Attitude toward governmental incentives on childbearing and its relationship with fertility preferences in couples attending premarital counseling clinic in health centers in Mashhad. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2014;24:1-13.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Khadivzadeh T, Latifnejad Roudsari R. Bahrami M, Taghipour A, Abbasi Shavazi MJ. A qualitative Approach to Understanding the Motivators for Reproduction. International Royan Congress on fertility and sterility. Tehran, Iran; 5-7 September, 2012.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Morita M, Ohtsuki H, Sasaki A, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M. Factors affecting the number of children in five developed countries: A statistical analysis with an evolutionary perspective. Lett Evol Behav Sci 2012;3:7-11.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Morgan SP, Bachrach CA. Is the theory of planned behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility? Vienna Yearbook Popul Res 2011;9:11-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P, Hosseini-Chavoshi M. National and provincial level fertility trends in Iran, 1972–2006. The Fertility Transition in Iran: Revolution and Reproduction. 2009:43-65.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Taghizadeh Z, Behmanesh F, Ebadi A. Marriage patterns and childbearing: Results from a quantitative study in North of Iran. Glob J Health Sci 2015;8:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
McDonald P. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Popul Dev Rev 2000;26:427-39.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mahmoudiani-Gilan S, Sadeghi R. Individual and provincial characteristics associated with reproductive behavior of married women in Iran (2011). J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci 2015;18:640-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Dauletova G, Karp L, Absattarova K. The indicators of reproductive behavior in young families as a criterion of the social and economic level of the society in Kazakhstan. Iran J Public Health 2012;41:19-25.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ghimire DJ, Axinn WG. Marital processes, arranged marriage, and contraception to limit fertility. Demography 2013;50:1663-86.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Hosseini H, Begi B, editors. Changes in Population Age Structure and Requirments for Population Policy Making in Iran. Sixth Congress of Iranian Demography; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Darroch JE, Singh S. Trends in contraceptive need and use in developing countries in 2003, 2008, and 2012: An analysis of national surveys. Lancet 2013;381:1756-62.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Mackenzie H, Drahota A, Pallikadavath S, Stones W, Dean T, Fogg C, et al. What is the Impact of Contraceptive Methods and Mixes of Contraceptive Methods on Contraceptive Prevalence, Unmet Need for Family Planning, and Unwanted and Unintended Pregnancies? EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Sadegh Moghadam L, Askari F, Marouzi P, Shams H, Tahmasbi S. Comparison of marriage satisfaction in housewives and employed women and their husbands in Gonabad. Horiz Med Sci 2006;12:45-50.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Rashid SF. Emerging changes in reproductive behaviour among married adolescent girls in an urban slum in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Reprod Health Matters 2006;14:151-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Claessens A. Gatekeeper Moms and (un) Involved Dads: What Happens after a Breakup. Unmarried Couples with Children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2007. p. 204-27.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Emran MS, Maret-Rakotondrazaka F, Smith SC. Education and freedom of choice: Evidence from arranged marriages in Vietnam. J Dev Stud 2014;50:481-501.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Ogunjuyigbe PO, Adeyemi EO. Mate selection and marital fertility: The case of the yorubas in the rural areas. Anthropologist 2003;5:9-15.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Caldwell JC, London B, Hadden K. The wealth flows theory of fertility decline. Rural Sociol 1989;54:169-88.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Ezeh AC. The influence of spouses over each other's contraceptive attitudes in Ghana. Stud Fam Plann 1993;24:163-74.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Salway S. How attitudes toward family planning and discussion between wives and husbands affect contraceptive use in Ghana. Int Fam Plan Perspect 1994;20:44-74.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Campbell JC, Pugh LC, Campbell D, Visscher M. The influence of abuse on pregnancy intention. Womens Health Issues 1995;5:214-23.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Glander SS, Moore ML, Michielutte R, Parsons LH. The prevalence of domestic violence among women seeking abortion. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:1002-6.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Klijzing E. Are there unmet family planning needs in Europe? Fam Plann Perspect 2000;32:74-81, 88.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Jejeebhoy SJ, Sathar ZA. Women's autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Popul Dev Rev 2001;27:687-712.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Manning WD, Trella D, Lyons H, Toit NC. Marriageable women: A focus on participants in a community healthy marriage program. Fam Relat 2010;59:87-102.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Maitra P. Parental bargaining, health inputs and child mortality in India. J Health Econ 2004;23:259-91.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
McCarraher DR, Bailey PE, Martin SL. The relationship between birth predictedness and violence during pregnancy among women in La Paz and El Alto, Bolivia. Matern Child Health J 2005;9:101-12.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Woldemicael G. Women's autonomy and reproductive preferences in Eritrea. J Biosoc Sci 2009;41:161-81.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Cowan PA, Cowan CP, Pruett MK, Pruett K, Wong JJ. Promoting fathers' engagement with children: Preventive interventions for low-income families. J Marriage Fam 2009;71:663-79.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Schoppe-Sullivan SJ, Weldon AH, Cook JC, Davis EF, Buckley CK. Coparenting behavior moderates longitudinal relations between effortful control and preschool children's externalizing behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009;50:698-706.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Link CF. Spousal communication and contraceptive use in rural Nepal: An event history analysis. Stud Fam Plann 2011;42:83-92.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Edin K, Nelson T, Reed JM. Daddy, Baby; Momma, Maybe. Social class and changing families in an unequal America. 2011; 21:85.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Kotila LE, Kamp Dush CM. Another baby? Father involvement and childbearing in fragile families. J Fam Psychol 2012;26:976-86.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Westoff CF. Unmet Need for Modern Contraceptive Methods; 2012. Available from: https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/AS28/AS28.pdf18/11/2018.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Chiao C, Yi CC, Ksobiech K. Community effects on pregnancy intention among cohabiting women in the Philippines: Implications for maternal and child health. Matern Child Health J 2012;16:1293-303.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Kamal SM, Islam MA. Interspousal communication on family planning and its effect on contraceptive adoption in Bangladesh. Asia Pac J Public Health 2012;24:506-21.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Matsumoto Y, Yamabe S. Family size preference and factors affecting the fertility rate in Hyogo, Japan. Reprod Health 2013;10:6.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Exavery A, Kanté AM, Njozi M, Tani K, Doctor HV, Hingora A, et al. Predictors of mistimed, and unwanted pregnancies among women of childbearing age in Rufiji, Kilombero, and Ulanga districts of Tanzania. Reprod Health 2014;11:63.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Kariman N, Amerian M, Jannati P, Salmani F. Factors influencing first childbearing timing decisions among men: Path analysis. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) 2016;14:589-96.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Okun BS. An investigation of the unexpectedly high fertility of secular, native-born Jews in Israel. Popul Stud (Camb) 2016;70:239-57.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Lundberg S, Pollak RA, Stearns J. Family inequality: Diverging patterns in marriage, cohabitation, and childbearing. J Econ Perspect 2016;30:79-102.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Rusibamayila A, Phillips J, Kalollela A, Jackson E, Baynes C. Factors influencing pregnancy intentions and contraceptive use: An exploration of the 'unmet need for family planning' in Tanzania. Cult Health Sex 2017;19:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Bramlett MD, Mosher WD. First marriage dissolution, divorce, and remarriage: United States (Advance data from vital and health statistics no. 323). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2001.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Frank O, McNicoll G. An interpretation of fertility and population policy in Kenya. Popul Dev Rev 1987;1:209-43.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Doss BD, Rhoades GK, Stanley SM, Markman HJ. The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: An 8-year prospective study. J Pers Soc Psychol 2009;96:601-19.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Manning WD, Smock PJ, Majumdar D. The relative stability of cohabiting and marital unions for children. Popul Res Policy Rev 2004;23:135-59.  Back to cited text no. 53
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed32    
    Printed9    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded16    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]